![]() 09/01/2017 at 19:13 • Filed to: DOTS NYC | ![]() | ![]() |
Right in front of my building, and for once I was fast enough with the camera:
‘66 I think ... I’ve driven one that’s identical.
![]() 09/01/2017 at 19:19 |
|
I never get tired of seeing those. Truly special.
![]() 09/01/2017 at 19:27 |
|
Well that’s an MKIII I think, ugly lights etc... The MKI is the gorgeous one.
![]() 09/01/2017 at 19:29 |
|
S3, somewhere in the 70s.
![]() 09/01/2017 at 19:30 |
|
Even the S2 roadster is great looking, but the S1 FHC is the one to have.
![]() 09/01/2017 at 19:32 |
|
I saw this on the other day, it was rough, looked like a project that started with the engine and is being driven. I am an E Type snob because it shares so much in common with the Zs, started out great and then was slowly ruined by regulations. I hate later E lights as much as 280Z bumpers. In the beginning I guess Nissan didn’t even try to get the light covers for the USA though, I have never heard why that was. Do you know what year that ruined the headlights for cars, I assumed early 70's since the Ferrari Daytona had to change as well.
![]() 09/01/2017 at 19:34 |
|
You, Sir, are far more picky discriminating than I. My wood would reach an equal number of inches for both.
![]() 09/01/2017 at 19:37 |
|
Not a huge S3 fan, but they’re still neat.
![]() 09/01/2017 at 20:24 |
|
All I remember is the Series 3 had awful hubcaps. I thought that might be S2?
![]() 09/01/2017 at 20:58 |
|
Looks longer than an S2 to me, plus the big rubber bumpers scream ‘1970s’ to me. I also think you can just make out the lower chrome surround of the front grill in the second picture, and the size of that would make it a 3.
I do reserve the right, however, to be totally wrong.